R2 vs OVHcloud
Cloud object storage pricing comparison. For a mid-size SaaS workload, OVHcloud is cheaper.
Cost Comparison by Scenario
Personal site, small app, or hobby project: 10GB storage, 50GB egress, 10,000 writes, 100,000 reads per month.
| Cost Component | R2 | OVHcloud |
|---|---|---|
| Storage | $0.15 | $0.11 |
| Egress | $0.00 | $0.55 |
| API Requests | $0.08 | $0.00 |
| Monthly Total | $0.23 | $0.66 |
| Annual Total | $3 | $8 |
R2 is 65% cheaper for this scenario, saving $0.43/mo ($5/year).
Feature Comparison
| Feature | R2 | OVHcloud |
|---|---|---|
| S3 Compatible | Yes | Yes |
| Zero Egress Cost | Yes | No |
| Free Tier | Yes | No |
| GDPR | Yes | Yes |
| HIPAA | No | No |
| SOC 2 | Yes | Yes |
| Encryption at Rest | Yes | Yes |
| Customer-Managed Keys | No | No |
| Sensitive Data | limited | full |
| Data Residency | US, EU, AP | EU |
| CDN Integration | cloudflare | cloudflare |
Strengths & Weaknesses
R2
Pros
- +Zero egress fees
- +S3-compatible API
- +Generous free tier (no expiry)
- +Simple flat-rate pricing
Cons
- −No lifecycle policies
- −Limited region control
- −No HIPAA support
- −Smaller ecosystem than AWS
OVHcloud
Pros
- +EU data sovereignty (French company)
- +GDPR-first approach
- +No API request fees
- +Competitive pricing
Cons
- −Primarily EU-focused regions
- −Smaller ecosystem
- −Less documentation in English
- −No HIPAA
When to Choose Which
Choose R2 if you need:
- High-egress workloads
- Static site assets
- CDN origin storage
- Budget-conscious projects
Choose OVHcloud if you need:
- EU data residency requirements
- GDPR-sensitive workloads
- European companies