GCS vs Vultr
Cloud object storage pricing comparison. For a mid-size SaaS workload, Vultr is cheaper.
Cost Comparison by Scenario
Personal site, small app, or hobby project: 10GB storage, 50GB egress, 10,000 writes, 100,000 reads per month.
| Cost Component | GCS | Vultr |
|---|---|---|
| Storage | $0.20 | $0.06 |
| Egress | $6.00 | $0.50 |
| API Requests | $0.09 | $0.00 |
| Monthly Total | $6.29 | $0.56 |
| Annual Total | $75 | $7 |
Vultr is 91% cheaper for this scenario, saving $5.73/mo ($69/year).
Feature Comparison
| Feature | GCS | Vultr |
|---|---|---|
| S3 Compatible | Yes | Yes |
| Zero Egress Cost | No | No |
| Free Tier | Yes | No |
| GDPR | Yes | Yes |
| HIPAA | Yes | No |
| SOC 2 | Yes | No |
| Encryption at Rest | Yes | Yes |
| Customer-Managed Keys | Yes | No |
| Sensitive Data | full | none |
| Data Residency | US, EU, AP, SA | US, EU, AP |
| CDN Integration | cloud-cdn, cloudflare, fastly | cloudflare |
Strengths & Weaknesses
GCS
Pros
- +Tight BigQuery integration
- +Strong ML/AI pipeline support
- +Autoclass storage optimization
- +Dual/multi-region options
Cons
- −High egress fees
- −Smaller community than AWS
- −Free tier egress very limited (1GB)
Vultr
Pros
- +Very low storage price ($0.006/GB)
- +S3-compatible API
- +No API request fees
- +Simple pricing
Cons
- −No SOC 2 or HIPAA
- −Limited features
- −Smaller ecosystem
- −No free tier
When to Choose Which
Choose GCS if you need:
- Data analytics pipelines
- BigQuery-heavy workloads
- ML training data storage
Choose Vultr if you need:
- Budget storage for non-sensitive data
- Vultr compute users
- Dev/staging environments